Fixing fraud: Flaws in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act and the current enforcement approach

Alison Cronin

No 129, IEA Discussion Papers from Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA)

Abstract: Given the high economic costs of fraud, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 aims to address the well-known deficiencies of the common law's approach to corporate criminal liability with the introduction of a corporate failure-to-prevent fraud offence (s.199, not yet in force) and the statutory extension to the common law's identification principle that attributes the criminal liability of senior officers to the corporate body (s.196, in force). Although the new failure-to-prevent fraud is disappointing in its limited application to just large companies, the extension of the range of officers whose guilt can be attributed to the corporation, for fraud and other specified offences, has real potential to serve as a powerful corporate deterrent that will undoubtedly extend responsibility to significantly increased numbers of individual managers. However, economic analysis demonstrates that the success of substantive law reform depends upon a radical change in the policy on corporate criminal enforcement such that large corporations should no longer be effectively guaranteed a disposal by way of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA). Although DPAs seek to address both the problem of detection and to mitigate collateral damage to otherwise innocent stakeholders, by offering leniency for self-disclosure bargains, this leads to a dramatic deficit in corporate deterrence and can incentivise unlawful corporate activity. For an effective anti-fraud law and therefore greater market efficiency, the currently flawed notion of collateral damage must be corrected; not least, it should include the costs of the demonstrably ineffective DPA enforcement regime and the consequent preservation of corporations that prosper through criminal activities. Economic analysis evidences the need for a credible threat of traditional prosecution of corporations and, to this end, for the use of a well-designed whistleblower reward scheme as the cornerstone to ensuring fair competition.

Date: 2024
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/314029/1/iea-dp129.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ieadps:314029

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IEA Discussion Papers from Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().