Necessary and inherent limits to internet surveillance

Joss Wright

Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, 2013, vol. 2, issue 3, 1-11

Abstract: Information technologies now play a huge role in both personal and institutional life, playing the role of a global communications medium. As our means of interaction increasingly centre on the internet, there is a desire from nation states to exercise control and obtain access to the communications of citizens. The stated reasons for this access and control are to prevent or investigate crimes, and to protect national security. This article argues that mass untargeted surveillance of internet-based communications is an excessive tool with respect to its potential for abuse against both society and individuals, and that its ability to prevent crime or terrorism are limited. By looking at existing technologies and example cases where surveillance has been applied, this article demonstrates that there are both inherent mathematical and technical limits to the potential for surveillance to achieve broad-scale prevention of crime and terrorism. In addition, the potential of surveillance to result in real harm to society necessarily places severe limits on how this technique should be applied in a free and democratic society.

Keywords: Surveillance; Intelligence services; Base rate fallacy; Interception; Fundamental principles; Predictive algorithms; Privacy; Security; Content data; Communications data; Bundestrojaner; National Security Agency (NSA); PRISM; Tempora; Encryption; Liability; Transparency; Cyber security; Content; Censorship; Filtering (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/213969/1/IntPolRev-2013-3-184.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:iprjir:213969

DOI: 10.14763/2013.3.184

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation from Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().