Bleeding data: The case of fertility and menstruation tracking apps

Anastasia Siapka and Elisabetta Biasin

Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, 2021, vol. 10, issue 4, 1-34

Abstract: Journalists, non-profits and consumer organisations, as well as the authors' first-hand review of relevant privacy policies reveal that fertility and menstruation tracking apps (FMTs) collect and share an excessive array of data. Through doctrinal legal research, we evaluate this data processing in light of data and consumer protection law but find the commonly invoked concepts of "vulnerability", "consent" and "transparency" insufficient to alleviate power imbalances. Instead, drawing on a feminist understanding of work and the autonomist "social factory", we argue that users perform unpaid, even gendered, consumer labour in the digital realm and explore the potential of a demand for wages.

Keywords: Data privacy; Fertility tracking; Consumer protection; Mobile apps (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/250399/1/1794121854.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:iprjir:250399

DOI: 10.14763/2021.4.1599

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation from Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().