AI as a study partner in mathematics education: Evidence from a multi-program university survey

Mehmet Evrim Altin, Kirsten Jäger, Silke Jütte and Florian Schneider

IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management from IU International University of Applied Sciences

Abstract: The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) tools is fundamentally reshaping learning practices in higher education, particularly in mathematics and statistics courses. This study investigates how undergraduate students across multiple programs at IU International University engage with AI-based mathematics tools, which applications they prefer, and how they evaluate their performance. Drawing on survey data from 174 students enrolled in mathematics lectures during the spring term of 2025, we analyze awareness, usage intensity, and perceived usability, understandability, correctness, and value for money of leading AI tools. The results reveal a highly concentrated market structure: ChatGPT, Photomath, and Gemini dominate student awareness and usage. While ChatGPT is perceived as the most user-friendly and offers strong value for money, Photomath receives the highest ratings for correctness of results. Gemini, in contrast, is evaluated more cautiously across dimensions. Differences in awareness between mathintensive and non-math-intensive programs are small and statistically insignificant, suggesting that AI adoption in mathematics is broadly distributed across disciplines. The findings indicate that students integrate AI tools primarily as complementary learning aids rather than replacements for traditional materials. Overall, the study provides an empirical baseline for understanding how AI functions as a study partner in mathematics education and highlights the growing importance of evaluating not only usage frequency but also perceived reliability and pedagogical value.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Mathematics Education; Student Perceptions; Learning Tools (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A22 C83 I21 I23 O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/342564/1/197990927X.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:iubhbm:342564

DOI: 10.56250/4120

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management from IU International University of Applied Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().