Payments, sovereignty, and critical infrastructure: The strategic case for the digital euro

Tobias Berg, Vincent Lindner and Denise Rößler

No 112, SAFE Policy Letters from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE

Abstract: After years of investigation, the digital euro project has entered the legislative stage. Geoeconomic developments, especially the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the following regime of sanctions against Russia, as well as the economist-nationalist policies of the second Trump administration, have reinforced arguments for EU monetary and infrastructure sovereignty. At the same time, however, the digital euro project is under pressure from private solutions, stablecoins and the European Wero initiative that claim to provide similar benefits as the digital euro. While these may develop into useful tools for payments, they fail to provide the same features, such as universal acceptance and legal certainty, competitive neutrality, and - crucially - EU sovereign control over settlement infrastructure. This Policy Letter calls upon EU policymakers to reject the false dichotomy between private solutions and a public infrastructure and to make swift progress on the legislation and implementation of the digital euro.

Date: 2026
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-eec and nep-mon
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/338129/1/1965369324.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:safepl:338129

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SAFE Policy Letters from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().