Taming national interests within the CFSP: Europe's cyber foreign and security policy as a test run

Annegret Bendiek, Max Becker, Camille Borrett and Paul Bochtler

No 19/2024, SWP Comments from Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs

Abstract: The political debate over implementing qualified majority voting (QMV) into the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) is of high political relevance, especially given the shifting geopolitical landscape in Europe, including Russia's aggression against Ukraine and uncertainties regarding the US's engagement post-2024 elections. Germany, along with a group of other EU member states, is leading efforts to integrate a "sovereignty safety net" within the CFSP framework. This initiative is designed to ease the concerns of reluctant member states, by providing enhanced veto options for matters affecting national interests. Moreover, mechanisms like constructive absten­tion and the "passerelle clause" could be further exploited to facilitate common CFSP actions without requiring treaty reforms. Nonetheless, it is crucial that all measures designed to build political consensus for expanding the use of QMV within the CFSP, strike the right balance between national interests and European solidarity. This balance is essential for strengthening the EU's resilience and operational capability. Cyber foreign and security policy, with its transnational nature and need for swift and unified responses, presents a favorable testing ground for this approach.

Keywords: Qualified majority voting; QMV; Common Foreign and Security Policy; CFSP; Common Security and Defence Policy; CSPD; constructive abstention; passerelle clause; Group of Friends; cybersecurity; cyberattacks; cyber diplomacy toolbox; CDT; European Peace Facility; Permanent Structured Cooperation; PESCO; EU Cyber Security Strategy; European Defence Union; Coordination Centre for the Cyber and Information Domain; Cyber Rapid Response Teams; European Repository of Cyber Incidents; EuRepoC; European Union Agency for Cybersecurity; ENISA; emergency brake; blocking minority; Ioannina mechanism; Passerelle-Verfahren (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-cis
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/297224/1/1887860746.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:swpcom:297224

DOI: 10.18449/2024C19

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SWP Comments from Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().