A quantitative analysis of trade policy cooperation scenarios
Eddy Bekkers,
Hryhorii Kalachyhin and
Lee Humphreys
No ERSD-2026-06, WTO Staff Working Papers from World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division
Abstract:
We present four stylized scenarios for the future of global trade policy cooperation: (i) Restructuring, (ii) Geo-Fragmentation; (iii) Breakdown; (iv) Reform. The four scenarios include different trajectories of tariffs, trade policy uncertainty, operational trade costs, and digital trade policies. A quantitative trade model is employed to simulate the long-run economic impacts on trade, output, production structure, and welfare. The simulations show that there is a lot at stake. Whereas a breakdown of global trade policy cooperation can lead to almost double-digit economic losses, reform scenarios can substantially raise global GDP (by 2%-3%). Restructuring and Geo-Fragmentation would reduce global GDP substantially by respectively about -1% and -6%. For most economies, Reform generates better welfare outcomes than Restructuring. There is large variation in economic effects across regions, and outcomes vary between regions across scenarios.
Keywords: Quantitative trade modeling; Trade policy; Fragmentation; Scenario Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/343990/1/1984174487.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:wtowps:343990
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in WTO Staff Working Papers from World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().