Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sepsis Detection

Asad Ullah, Huma Qayyum, Farman Hassan, Muhammad Khateeb Khan, Auliya Ur Rahman ()
Additional contact information
Asad Ullah, Huma Qayyum, Farman Hassan, Muhammad Khateeb Khan, Auliya Ur Rahman: University of Engineering and Technology Taxila, Punjab Pakistan

International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 2022, vol. 4, issue 1, 175-188

Abstract: Sepsis is a very fatal disease, causing a lot of causalities all over the world, about 2, 70,000 die of Sepsis annually, thus early detection of Sepsis disease would be a remedy to prevent this disease and it would be a big relief to the family of sepsis patients. Different researchers have worked on sepsis disease detection and its prediction but still the need to have an improved model for Sepsis detection remains. We compared various machine learning algorithms for Sepsis detection and used the dataset publicly available for all the researchers at Physionet.org, the dataset contains many empty or Null values, we applied backward filling and forward filling techniques, and we calculated missing values of MAP using equation (1) which gives more precise results, we divided the 40,336 files of datasets A and B into 80% training set and 20% testing set. We applied the algorithms twice one time using vital signs and clinical values of patients and the second time using only vital signs of the patients; using vital signs only the training accuracy of KNN, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, MLP, and Decision Trees was 0.992, 0.999, 0.981, 0.981, and 0.981 respectively, while the testing accuracy of KNN, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, MLP, and Decision Trees was 0.987, 0.980, 0.983, 0.981, and 0.981 respectively, for Sepsis Label 0, the value of precision for KNN, Random Forest, Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, and MLP was 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.98 respectively, while the value of recall for KNN, Random Forest, Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, and MLP was 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, and 1.00 respectively; the comparison of all the above-mentioned algorithms showed that KNN leads over all the competitors regarding the accuracy, precision, and recall.

Keywords: Sepsis detection; Machine Learning; KNN; MLP; Random Forest; Logistic Regression; decision trees; forward filling technique; backward filling technique (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/190 (application/pdf)
https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/190 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:175-188

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Syed Amer Mahmood

More articles in International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology from 50sea
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iqra Nazeer ().