Economics at your fingertips  

Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?

Manuel Bagues (), Mauro Sylos-Labini () and Natalia Zinovyeva ()

American Economic Review, 2017, vol. 107, issue 4, 1207-38

Abstract: We analyze how a larger presence of female evaluators affects committee decision-making using information on 100,000 applications to associate and full professorships in Italy and Spain. These applications were assessed by 8,000 randomly selected evaluators. A larger number of women in evaluation committees does not increase either the quantity or the quality of female candidates who qualify. Information from individual voting reports suggests that female evaluators are not significantly more favorable toward female candidates. At the same time, male evaluators become less favorable toward female candidates as soon as a female evaluator joins the committee.

JEL-codes: I23 J16 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.20151211
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) (application/zip) ... N1a351h0Ourv_MtzLbob (application/pdf) ... HuHAXOtaQCsiRYSn9s0y (application/zip)

Related works:
Working Paper: Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter? (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().

Page updated 2019-10-01
Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:4:p:1207-38