How to Control Controlled School Choice: Comment
American Economic Review, 2017, vol. 107, issue 4, 1362-64
Echenique and Yenmez (2015), in Theorem 2, characterize choice rules that are "generated by reserves for the priority." We show that the "only if" part is not correct. We exhibit a choice rule that is generated by reserves for the priority but violates one of their axioms. We reformulate the axiom and repair the result.
JEL-codes: D47 H75 I21 I28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.20160913
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... 5PMx8jJYgRHMTIkfQlcK (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: How to Control Controlled School Choice: Comment (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:4:p:1362-64
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jane Voros ().