Economics at your fingertips  

How Are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel

Justine Hastings and Jesse Shapiro ()

American Economic Review, 2018, vol. 108, issue 12, 3493-3540

Abstract: We use a novel retail panel with detailed transaction records to study the effect of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on house-hold spending. We use administrative data to motivate three approaches to causal inference. The marginal propensity to consume SNAP-eligible food (MPCF) out of SNAP benefits is 0.5 to 0.6. The MPCF out of cash is much smaller. These patterns obtain even for households for whom SNAP benefits are economically equivalent to cash because their benefits are below their food spending. Using a semiparametric framework, we reject the hypothesis that households respect the fungibility of money. A model with mental accounting can match the facts.

JEL-codes: D12 H75 I12 I18 I38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.20170866
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) (application/zip) ... RGQbDjOe2QhfZoC9wFsn (application/pdf) ... XGqWM0O-0P_UwGWf_A0S (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: How Are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().

Page updated 2020-09-14
Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:108:y:2018:i:12:p:3493-3540