How Are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel
Justine Hastings and
Jesse Shapiro
No 23112, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
We use a novel retail panel with detailed transaction records to study the effect of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on household spending. We use administrative data to motivate three approaches to causal inference. The marginal propensity to consume SNAP-eligible food (MPCF) out of SNAP benefits is 0.5 to 0.6. The MPCF out of cash is much smaller. These patterns obtain even for households for whom SNAP benefits are economically equivalent to cash because their benefits are below their food spending. Using a semiparametric framework, we reject the hypothesis that households respect the fungibility of money. A model with mental accounting can match the facts.
JEL-codes: D12 H31 I38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-01
Note: PE
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Published as Justine Hastings & Jesse M. Shapiro, 2018. "How Are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel," American Economic Review, vol 108(12), pages 3493-3540.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w23112.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: How Are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel (2018) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23112
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w23112
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().