Belief Elicitation and Behavioral Incentive Compatibility
David Danz,
Lise Vesterlund and
Alistair Wilson
American Economic Review, 2022, vol. 112, issue 9, 2851-83
Abstract:
Subjective beliefs are crucial for economic inference, yet behavior can challenge the elicitation. We propose that belief elicitation should be incentive compatible not only theoretically but also in a de facto behavioral sense. To demonstrate, we show that the binarized scoring rule, a state-of-the-art elicitation, violates two weak conditions for behavioral incentive compatibility: (i) within the elicitation, information on the incentives increases deviations from truthful reporting; and (ii) in a pure choice over the set of incentives, most deviate from the theorized maximizer. Moreover, we document that deviations are systematic and center-biased, and that the elicited beliefs substantially distort inference.
JEL-codes: D83 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (42)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201248 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.3886/E157161V1 (text/html)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201248.appx (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201248.ds (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:112:y:2022:i:9:p:2851-83
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20201248
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().