Sticky Spending, Sequestration, and Government Debt
Facundo Piguillem and
Alessandro Riboni
American Economic Review, 2024, vol. 114, issue 11, 3513-50
Abstract:
Once established, government spending programs tend to continue. A commonly held view is that spending inertia leads to unsustainable debt, ultimately requiring fiscal adjustments such as "sequestration." We show that by insuring against political turnover, inertia may reduce politicians' incentives to accumulate debt. However, large preexisting commitments and the prospect of future stabilization can lead to overspending to dilute past administrations' commitments. Finally, we show that political polarization amplifies incentives to prioritize inertial programs, potentially explaining the increased share of mandatory spending in the US budget.
JEL-codes: D72 E62 H61 H63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20210935 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.3886/E201443V1 (text/html)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20210935.appx (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20210935.ds (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Sticky Spending, Sequestration, and Government Debt (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:114:y:2024:i:11:p:3513-50
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20210935
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().