EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Trade Restrictiveness and Deadweight Losses from US Tariffs

Douglas Irwin

American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2010, vol. 2, issue 3, 111-33

Abstract: This paper calculates a trade restrictiveness index, i.e., the uniform tariff that yields the same welfare loss as an existing tariff structure, for nearly a century of US data. The results show that the average tariff understates the TRI by about 75 percent. The static deadweight loss from US tariffs is about 1 percent of GDP after the Civil War, but falls almost continuously thereafter to less than one-tenth of 1 percent of GDP. Import duties produced an average welfare loss of 40 cents for every dollar of revenue, slightly higher than contemporary estimates of the marginal cost of taxation. (JEL F13, N71, N72)

JEL-codes: F13 N71 N72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
Note: DOI: 10.1257/pol.2.3.111
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/pol.2.3.111 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/pol/data/2009-0002_data.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:111-33

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Economic Policy is currently edited by Matthew Shapiro

More articles in American Economic Journal: Economic Policy from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:111-33