The Iceberg Theory of Campaign Contributions: Political Threats and Interest Group Behavior
Marcos Chamon () and
Ethan Kaplan ()
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2013, vol. 5, issue 1, 1-31
We present a model where special interest groups condition contributions on the receiving candidate's support and also her opponent's. This allows interest groups to obtain support from contributions as well as from threats of contributing. Out-of-equilibrium contributions help explain the missing money puzzle. Our framework contradicts standard models in predicting that interest groups give to only one side of a race. We also predict that special interest groups will mainly target lopsided winners, whereas general interest groups will contribute mainly to candidates in close races. We verify these predictions in FEC data for US House elections from 1984-1990. (JEL D72)
JEL-codes: D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/pol.5.1.1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:1-31
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy is currently edited by Matthew Shapiro
More articles in American Economic Journal: Economic Policy from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().