US State Fiscal Policy and Natural Resources
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2015, vol. 7, issue 3, 238-57
An analytical framework predicts that, in response to an exogenous increase in resource-based government revenue, a benevolent government will partially substitute away from taxing income, increase spending and save. Fifty-one years of US-state level data are largely consistent with this theory. A baseline fixed effects model predicts that a $1.00 increase in resource revenue results in a $0.25 decrease in nonresource revenue, a $0.43 increase in spending and a $0.32 increase in savings. Instrumenting for resource revenue reveals that a positive revenue shock is largely saved and the rest is transferred back to residents in the form of lower non resource tax rates. (JEL H71, H72, H76, Q38, R11)
JEL-codes: H71 H72 H76 Q38 R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/pol.20130211
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: U.S. State Fiscal Policy and Natural Resources (2014)
Working Paper: U.S. State Fiscal Policy and Natural Resources (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:238-57
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy is currently edited by Matthew Shapiro
More articles in American Economic Journal: Economic Policy from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().