Journal of Economic Literature, 1997, vol. 35, issue 2, 757-765
Margaret Jane Radin's new book, Contested Commodities, is reviewed. The book's thesis is that some activities are too close to the intrinsic identity of persons to be proper subjects of the market and that discourse which treats all such activities as commodities can itself create harm. She therefore argues for a concept of "incomplete commodification." The review first locates Radin's thesis as part of a long tradition. Second, it notes that a state-based or legal determination of which goods are so deeply personal is certainly not clearly superior to self-determination in the context of a market. Third, it argues that the effect of discourse on behavior is not empirically clear and that acting on the view that discourse can threaten deep values can lead to limits on freedom.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:35:y:1997:i:2:p:757-765
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf
More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().