Economists' Views about Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics
Victor Fuchs (),
Alan Krueger and
James Poterba ()
Journal of Economic Literature, 1998, vol. 36, issue 3, 1387-1425
Specialists in labor economics and public economics at 40 leading research universities provided opinions of policy proposals, quantitative best estimates and 95-percent confidence intervals for economic parameters, and answers to values questions regarding income redistribution, efficiency versus equity, and individual versus social responsibility. Their positions on policy are more closely related to their values than to their estimates of relevant economic parameters. Average best estimates of the economic parameters agree well with the relevant literature, but individual best estimates are usually widely dispersed. The individual 95-percent confidence intervals are much narrower than the substantial cross-respondent variation in estimates would warrant.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (163) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:36:y:1998:i:3:p:1387-1425
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf
More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().