Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
Chris Starmer ()
Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, vol. 38, issue 2, 332-382
This article reviews recent developments in the economic theory of individual decision making under risk. Since the 1950s it has been known that individual choices violate the standard model of expected utility in predictable ways. Considerable research effort has now been devoted to the project of developing a superior descriptive model. Following an overview of non-expected utility theories which distinguishes between "conventional" and "non-conventional" approaches, the paper seeks to assess these alternative models in terms of empirical success (using laboratory and field data) and theoretical usefulness. The closing sections reflect on some new directions emerging in this literature.
JEL-codes: D81 D11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/jel.38.2.332
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (552) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:38:y:2000:i:2:p:332-382
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf
More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().