Incorporating Limited Rationality into Economics
Matthew Rabin
Journal of Economic Literature, 2013, vol. 51, issue 2, 528-43
Abstract:
Harstad and Selten (this forum) raise interesting questions about the relative promise of optimization models and bounded-rationality models in making progress in economics. This article builds from their analysis by indicating the potential for using neoclassical (broadly defined) optimization models to integrate insights from psychology on the limits to rationality into economics. I lay out an approach to making (imperfect and incremental) improvements over previous economic theory by incorporating greater realism while attempting to maintain the breadth of application, the precision of predictions, and the insights of neoclassical theory. I then discuss how many human limits to full rationality are, in fact, well understood in terms of optimization.
JEL-codes: B49 D01 D03 D81 D84 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
Note: DOI: 10.1257/jel.51.2.528
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.51.2.528 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/jel/ds/5102/JEL.51.2.528_ds.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:51:y:2013:i:2:p:528-43
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf
More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().