Affirmative Action and the Quality-Fit Trade-Off
Peter Arcidiacono and
Michael Lovenheim ()
Journal of Economic Literature, 2016, vol. 54, issue 1, 3-51
This paper reviews the literature on affirmative action in undergraduate education and law schools, focusing especially on the trade-off between institutional quality and the fit between a school and a student. We discuss the conditions under which affirmative action for underrepresented minorities (URM) could help or harm their educational outcomes. We provide descriptive evidence on the extent of affirmative action in law schools, as well as a critical review of the contentious literature on how affirmative action affects URM law-school student performance. Our review then discusses affirmative action in undergraduate admissions, focusing on the effects such admissions preferences have on college quality, graduation rates, college major, and earnings. We conclude by examining the evidence on "percent plans" as a replacement for affirmative action. ( JEL I23, I26, I28, J15, J31, J44, K10)
JEL-codes: I23 I26 I28 J15 J31 J44 K10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/jel.54.1.3
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (44) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: Affirmative Action and the Quality-Fit Tradeoff (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:54:y:2016:i:1:p:3-51
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf
More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().