Ideology, Economic Policy, and Economic History: Cohen and DeLong's Concrete Economics

Alexander Field

Journal of Economic Literature, 2017, vol. 55, issue 4, 1526-55

Abstract: Stephen S. Cohen and J. Bradford DeLong view US economic policy extending up to 1980 as pragmatically fostering growth. This they interpret as the Hamiltonian tradition, and their intent is to rescue policy debate from the data- and logic-free quagmire into which they believe it has fallen. Following an introduction, section 2 of this essay describes methods and evidence that permit statements about the historical influence of ideological thinking more empirically grounded than those essayed by the authors. Section 3 examines specific aspects of their narrative. Section 4 considers what we mean by ideological thinking, and why it might be deleterious.

JEL-codes: D72 E61 L52 N41 N42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
Note: DOI: 10.1257/jel.20161442
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20161442 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... LdZFZ566--ej0eaJilcX (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:55:y:2017:i:4:p:1526-55

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf

More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().