The Case for Imposing Cashlessness: A Review Article
Neil Wallace
Journal of Economic Literature, 2018, vol. 56, issue 4, 1587-91
Abstract:
In The Curse of Cash, Rogoff (2016) makes two arguments. (i) Large denominations of currency are primarily used for illegal activity. Therefore, eliminating them would have benefits that far outweigh the costs in terms of lost seigniorage. (ii) The zero lower bound (ZLB) on the interest rate implied by the possibility of holding large amounts of currency is a costly constraint on central-bank policy. The best way to eliminate the ZLB is to eliminate all but small denominations of currency, ten dollars and lower, and to have those be in the form of coins. The style of the book, no models and no symbols, works fairly well for (i), but not so well for (ii). For (ii), the author is unclear about a crucial matter: what fiscal policy accompanies alternative interest-rate settings chosen by the central bank?
JEL-codes: E26 E42 E43 E52 E58 E62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
Note: DOI: 10.1257/jel.20171459
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/jel.20171459 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... 5UoNJFU3W1Bq546IVxrr (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:56:y:2018:i:4:p:1587-91
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf
More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().