El impacto de las respuestas inconsistentes en las medidas de bienestar estimadas con el método del experimento de elección

Beatriz Rocamora, Sergio Colombo and Klaus Glenk

Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 2014, vol. 14, issue 02, 22

Abstract: Choice experiments have become an important tool to provide guidance about the value of environmental goods and services. Several evidences, however, are pointing toward an important mismatch between the rationality principles assumed by this methodology and real respondents’ behaviour, what may be giving rise to inconsistent choices. This paper studies the effects of such inconsistencies by using data from an online survey aimed at valuing the environmental impacts of organic farming in mountainous olive groves. The results are analysed by means of three random parameter models and provide evidence on the necessity to appropriately consider and treat choice inconsistencies as a result of their influence on welfare estimates.

Keywords: Agribusiness; Demand and Price Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/195721/files/Cap2.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:earnsa:195721

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.195721

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales from Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().