U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission vs. Marketing Advisory Services, Inc.: A Case Study

Dennis M. Conley

International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2011, vol. 14, issue 3, 23

Abstract: Students are asked to evaluate the merits of a lawsuit that agricultural producers filed, along with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), against their marketing advisory service. The lawsuit was motivated by apparent losses in their commodity accounts allegedly caused by speculative trading.

Keywords: Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance; Financial Economics; Risk and Uncertainty; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/114717/files/20110021_Formatted.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ifaamr:114717

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.114717

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Food and Agribusiness Management Review from International Food and Agribusiness Management Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().