Capital Structure and Religion. Some International Evidence
Ingrid Dragota (),
Victor Dragotă (),
Andreea Curmei-Semenescu () and
Daniel Traian Pele ()
Additional contact information
Andreea Curmei-Semenescu: Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Finance and Center of Financial and Monetary Research (CEFIMO), Bucharest, Romania
Acta Oeconomica, 2018, vol. 68, issue 3, 415-442
In the recent years, an increasing number of papers deepened cross-disciplinary studies, examining how different cultural values infl uence financial variables. The main objective of our paper is to test if the dominant world religions (Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Islamic, and Judaic), and, moreover, some Christian denominations (Catholicism, Protestantism and Eastern Orthodox Christianity) are related to some patterns in capital structure. Our paper considers distinctly the category of countries in which Agnostics, Atheists and non-religious people are predominant. The results are promising. Companies located in the states with predominance of Islamic religion have a lower leverage, while the ones from predominantly Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Hindu and Judaic countries, as well as those in mainly Agnostic, Atheist and non-religious ones, are indebted more than those from mainly Protestant countries. The debt maturity seems to be correlated to the dominant religions or denominations, with companies in the predominantly Eastern Orthodox, Buddhist and Agnostic, Atheist and non-religious countries relying more on short term debt, and those in the majority Catholic, Judaic and Hindu countries on long term debt.
Keywords: capital structure; culture; religion; firm-specific factors; country-specific factors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G32 Z12 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: This work was partially supported by the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI), project number AT code 86/2007, and cofinanced by the Center of Financial and Monetary Research (CEFIMO). The authors wish to thank for the useful comments received on preliminary drafts of this paper to the participants to the EWGFM Conference in Stockholm (2008), EMQFB Conference in Tîrgu-Mureş (2013), FWPO Conference in Cluj-Napoca (2013) and EWGCFM Conference in Vienna (2013). The remaining errors are ours. The authors benefited also from the useful remarks provided by Elena Dumitrescu, Claudiu Herţeliu and Hanaan Yaseen.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aka:aoecon:v:68:y:2018:i:3:p:415-442
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt., Prielle K. u. 21-35. Budapest, 1117, Hungary
Access Statistics for this article
Acta Oeconomica is currently edited by Mihályi, Péter
More articles in Acta Oeconomica from Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vajda, Lőrinc ().