EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The European Union’s failed “Lisbon strategy”

Arno Tausch

Society and Economy, 2010, vol. 32, issue 1, 103-121

Abstract: Is Europe becoming the world’s leading knowledge-based economic area of the world, as European leaders planned at their Lisbon meeting in 2000? In this article, we analyze the Lisbon performance of the countries of the European Union from a long-term, structural perspective. We examine performance in the Lisbon indicators by factor analytical means. To measure progress, we observe contradictions between some of the indicators, chosen by the member governments and the European Commission. Finally, we conclude that only a Schumpeterian vision of capitalism as a process of “creative destruction,” or rather “destructive creation,” can explain these contradictions, which we empirically reveal in this analysis, and which beset the “Lisbon strategy” from the very beginning. European decision-makers often seem to be unaware of these underlying contradictions, which is why the goal of our paper is to clarify the processes involved. In Schumpeter’s elitist-conservative visions of society, the decay of values in the capitalist society was an all-important element in his pessimistic theory developed in “Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy”. For Schumpeter the disappearance of the enterprising, male-dominated capitalist family was a critical element in his theory. But it is not the disappearance of the enterprising capitalist family that threatens the future of capitalism in Europe, but the often still existing incompatibility of work and family life, which explains more than 60% of the Lisbon process failure.

Keywords: social spending; creative destruction; spatial models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 C43 F15 F2 F5 R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
Note: Opinions expressed in this contribution are exclusively those of the author in his capacity as adjunct professor. The author wishes to express his gratitude to Peter Herrmann and Gernot Kohler for their comments on the draft.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.akademiai.com/content/l3133n0217501184/fulltext.pdf (application/pdf)
subscription

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aka:soceco:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:103-121

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt., P. O. Box 245, H-1519 Budapest, Hungary
https://akjournals.com/

Access Statistics for this article

Society and Economy is currently edited by Szent-Iványi, Balázs

More articles in Society and Economy from Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kriston, Orsolya ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:103-121