Economics at your fingertips  

Polish Investments on Non-European Markets

Michał Zaremba
Additional contact information
Michał Zaremba: University of Lodz

International Economics, 2016, issue 15, 211-222

Abstract: Foreign direct investment is probably one of the most visible signs of globalization in recent years. Developing countries seek FDIs as a potential tool to complement the level of domestic investment as well as a possible efficiency-gain instrument through the transfer of appropriate technology, management knowledge, business culture, access to foreign markets, increasing employment opportunities, and improving living standards. Undoubtedly, non-European markets, mostly represented by developing countries, are becoming an important and attractive area for economic activities for highly- and medium-developed economies. The aim of the paper is to discuss and present the investment activities of Polish companies on non-European markets as it poses challenge not only for the companies themselves but also for the government to support the logistical and financial needs of the potential investors.

Keywords: foreign direct investment; developing countries; development economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F21 F23 F41 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) ... quence=1&isAllowed=y (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

International Economics is currently edited by Piotr Gabrielczak

More articles in International Economics from University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by International Economics ().

Page updated 2021-03-28
Handle: RePEc:ann:inecon:y:2016:i:15:p:211-222