Modeling Imprecision in Perception, Valuation, and Choice
Michael Woodford ()
Annual Review of Economics, 2020, vol. 12, issue 1, 579-601
Traditional decision theory assumes that people respond to the exact features of the options available to them, but observed behavior seems much less precise. This review considers ways of introducing imprecision into models of economic decision making and stresses the usefulness of analogies with the way that imprecise perceptual judgments are modeled in psychophysics—the branch of experimental psychology concerned with the quantitative relationship between objective features of an observer's environment and elicited reports about their subjective appearance. It reviews key ideas from psychophysics, provides examples of the kinds of data that motivate them, and proposes lessons for economic modeling. Applications include stochastic choice, choice under risk, decoy effects in marketing, global game models of strategic interaction, and delayed adjustment of prices in response to monetary disturbances.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
Working Paper: Modeling Imprecision in Perception, Valuation and Choice (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:reveco:v:12:y:2020:p:579-601
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annual Review of Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().