Similar or different? A comparison of Austrian and feminist economics

Alicja Sielska, Arkadiusz Sieroń and Ryszard Kubisz

Ekonomista, 2024, issue 1, 54-72

Abstract: Some researchers, including Horwitz (1995), point out similarities between two heterodox schools of economic thought, viz. the Austrians and the feminists. These similarities include criticisms of neoclassical assumptions about the rationality of market participants, perfect competition, and the mathematization of economics. This paper, however, argues that these similarities are superficial, as there are numerous methodological differences between these two schools that have led to divergent views on such issues as the nature of orthodox economics and its research methods, subjectivity, utility functions and their interpersonal comparison, market competition, and gender discrimination in the labor market. It is contended that these differences are difficult to reconcile, making any rapprochement between the two schools unlikely.

Keywords: Austrian economics; feminist economics; methodology; utility; interventionism; discrimination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B00 B53 B54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ekonomista.pte.pl/pdf-174963-107492 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2024:i:1:p:54-72

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Ekonomista from Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tomasz Kwarcinski ().