Sufficiency and stability of evidence for public health interventions using cumulative meta-analysis

P. Muellerleile and B. Mullen

American Journal of Public Health, 2006, vol. 96, issue 3, 515-522

Abstract: We propose cumulative meta-analysis as the procedure of completing a new meta-analysis at each successive wave in a research database. Two facets of cumulative knowledge are considered: the first, sufficiency, refers to whether the meta-analytic database adequately demonstrates that a public health intervention works. The second, stability, refers to the shifts over time in the accruing evidence about whether a public health intervention works. We used a hypothetical data set to develop the indicators of sufficiency and stability, and then applied them to existing, published datasets. Our discussion centers on the implications of the use of this procedure in evaluating public health interventions.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2003.036343

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2003.036343_9

DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.036343

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().