Workplace wellness programs: How regulatory flexibility might undermine success
J.L. Pomeranz
American Journal of Public Health, 2014, vol. 104, issue 11, 2052-2056
Abstract:
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act revised the law related to workplace wellness programs, which have become part of the nation's broader health strategy. Health-contingent programs are required to be reasonably designed. However, the regulatory requirements are lax and might undermine program efficacy in terms of both health gains and financial return. I propose a method for the government to support a best-practices approach by considering an accreditation or certification process. Additionally I discuss the need for program evaluation and the potential for employers to be subject to litigation if programs are not carefully implemented. © 2014, American Public Health Association Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: government regulation; health care policy; health promotion; human; legislation and jurisprudence; organization and management; program evaluation; United States; workplace, Government Regulation; Health Promotion; Humans; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Program Evaluation; United States; Workplace (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302149
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302149_1
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302149
Access Statistics for this article
American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia
More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().