Limitations of provider interventions in hypertension quality assurance

R.N. Winickoff, S. Wilner, R. Neisuler and G.O. Barnett

American Journal of Public Health, 1985, vol. 75, issue 1, 43-46

Abstract: In an institutional quality assurance program in hypertension, performance of tests, control of blood pressure, and follow-up were monitored through a computer program that was developed to audit records in an automated record system. Two types of feedback previously shown to be effective were provided quarterly for a period of one year to experimental providers. For all hypertensives considered together, there were no differences between scores of Experimental and Control providers based on percentage of patients meeting pre-set criteria in testing - 87% vs 87% -, blood prssure control - 58% vs 59% -, or follow-up - 79% vs 77%. Only small but significant differences occurred in the subgroup of moderate to severe hypertensives. There appear to be limitations to what can be accomplished through hypertension quality assurance interventions directed at providers of care in this institutional setting. Interventions designed to deal directly with patients whose blood pressures are uncontrolled may be more effective.

Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.75.1.43

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.75.1.43_1

DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.75.1.43

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().