Establishing efficient interview periods for gonorrhea patients

E.T. Starcher , M.A. Kramer, B. Carlota Orduna and D.F. Lundberg

American Journal of Public Health, 1983, vol. 73, issue 12, 1381-1384

Abstract: From February through December 1978, venereal disease casefinders in Polk County, Iowa used an expanded interview period of at least 120 days to interview 983 gonorrhea patients for sexual partner information. We grouped patients according to sex and clinical findings and evaluated the percentage of all new cases identified by time intervals within the expanded interview period. Ninety-one per cent of all untreated, infected sexual partners of symptomatic males were identified by using an interview period which spanned the interval from data of treatment to 15 days before symptoms onset. In contrast, the traditional 30-day interview period missed 23 per cent of those untreated, infected partners named by women with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), 34 percent of those partners named by women with uncomplicated gonorrhea, and 29 percent of those named by asymptomatic men. The Polk County data suggests the importance of basing interview periods upon a patient's sex and clinical presentation.

Date: 1983
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1983:73:12:1381-1384_3

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().