EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Tick testing as a method of controlling Rocky Mountain spotted fever

J.J. Sacks, T.A.F. Pinner and R.L. Parker

American Journal of Public Health, 1983, vol. 73, issue 8, 903-906

Abstract: In South Carolina, 1974-1980, only two matches were found between 536 Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) cases and 965 individuals who submitted ticks that tested rickettsial antigen positive. In neither case did the positive test prevent RMSF. Tick rickettsial positivity rates varied inversely with human RMSF attack rates in different geographic areas. A physician survey established it as unlikely that RMSF ocurred in positive tick submitters (PTS), and that although not recommended, 34% of asymptomatic PTS received prophylactic treatment. Only 18% of positive ticks were engorged. Tick testing appears ineffective in preventing RMSF.

Date: 1983
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1983:73:8:903-906_4

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1983:73:8:903-906_4