Preventive content of adult primary care: Do generalists and subspecialists differ?

A.J. Dietrich and H. Goldberg

American Journal of Public Health, 1984, vol. 74, issue 3, 223-227

Abstract: We compared preventive care performed by 20 generalists and 20 subspecialists practicing in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, California, by auditing charts of adult primary care patients for compliance with recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Generalists and subspecialists both provided 49 per cent of recommended preventive services. The two groups did not differ significantly in performance of any individual service. Performance varied widely within both groups. Of many factors explored, only two were associated with more preventive services: provision of a complete physical examination to the patient, and a physician's belief in the importance of a given service. The 'generalist vs. subspecialist' debate assumes that a physician's specialty classification is an important predictor of behavior. For the performance of preventive care, this was not true in our study. Instead, physicians' beliefs and practice habits may be major determinants of the quality of preventive care provided. These exploratory findings needed confirmation in other settings.

Date: 1984
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:3:223-227_2

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().