Accuracy of fetal death reports: Comparison with data from an independent stillbirth assessment program

A.E. Greb, R.M. Pauli and R.S. Kirby

American Journal of Public Health, 1987, vol. 77, issue 9, 1202-1206

Abstract: We evaluated the completeness and accuracy of reporting on Wisconsin fetal death report forms (FDF) through case by case comparison with data from the Wisconsin Stillbirth Service Project (WiSSP), which uses extensive protocols for etiologic investigation of stillborns. Fetal deaths are underreported: no FDF was submitted for 17.8 per cent of fetal deaths evaluated through the WiSSP. For those for whom FDF were submitted, fetal anomalies were often unrecognized or unreported: only 60 per cent of stillborns identified by the WiSSP as having fetal anomalies had any indication of the presence of such anomalies on FDF. When causes of death were classified into fetal, placental/cord, maternal/environmental, and unknown, comparison of reported underlying cause of death revealed marked inaccuracies on FDF. Placental/cord causes reported on FDF often could not be documented subsequently while, in contrast, fetal causes of death were underreported. Few accurate fetal diagnoses were present on FDF. Even among common lethal malformations misdiagnosis occurred frequently.

Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1987:77:9:1202-1206_1

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().