Is it cost-beneficial to screen adolescent males for Chlamydia?

E.R. Alexander

American Journal of Public Health, 1990, vol. 80, issue 5, 531-532

Abstract: In conclusion, when it can be demonstrated that the need is great, an action produces the desired benefits, the risks are not too high, the intervention is economically feasible, and there are no viable, more scientifically certain alternatives, then policy-makers should proceed even in the face of less than complete evidence. It should be remembered that scientific uncertainty may be exploited by special interest groups as a shield for opposition to the measure. Public policy decisions may be said to be made or not made on the basis of scientific uncertainty, but they may in actuality be driven by political or economic considerations. With respect to balancing individual rights and the public interest, it is clear that, in many instances, these two interests will be congruent. If they conflict, however, then weight should be given to the public interest in line with the principle that public health is social justice.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1990:80:5:531-532_1

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().