The dependence potential of short half-life benzodiazepines: A meta- analysis
D.D. Hallfors and
L. Saxe
American Journal of Public Health, 1993, vol. 83, issue 9, 1300-1304
Abstract:
Objectives. The dependence potential of benzodiazepine medications is now widely recognized, but uncertainty exists as to whether use of short half- life vs long half-life drugs results in greater dependence. The present study reports a meta-analysis of the extant research to evaluate the dependence potential of different types of benzodiazepines. Method. Seven studies were found that specifically compared long half-life and short half-life benzodiazepines and allowed statistical comparison by their homogeneous dependent variables. Drugs in these studies were used as daytime sedatives. Results. Substantial evidence was found for differential effects of short vs long half-life drugs at withdrawal. In all studies, dropouts were higher among short half-life subjects. In the random-assignment short-term use studies, Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores showed higher incidence of rebound among subjects who used the short half-life drugs. Conclusions. The present meta-analysis confirms clinical impressions of the greater dependence potential of short vs long half-life benzodiazepines. Doctors, patients, and policymakers need to be informed so as to avoid harm to the public health through unintended drug dependence.
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:9:1300-1304_1
Access Statistics for this article
American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia
More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().