 The role of state health departments in formulating policy: A survey on the case of AIDSL. Robins and C. Backstrom American Journal of Public Health, 1994, vol. 84, issue 6, 905-909 Abstract: Objectives. Public health departments have been criticized for not being on the cutting edge of health policy formation in the United States and, in particular, for being ineffective in dealing with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This study examines the attitudes and influence of public health officials on this problem. Methods. A survey of state health department officials was supplemented by surveys of state legislature health committee chairs and hospital association directors, as well as by interviews with key AIDS policymakers and observers in six states. Results. Both in their own eyes and in the eyes of legislative leaders and hospital association officials, public health officials were considered to be the principal initiators of public policy on AIDS. Conclusions. Contrary to the Institute of Medicine's 1988 report, state health departments are leaders in the fight against AIDS at the state level. Moreover, we argue that public health departments should be judged on how effectively they perform functions for which they have primary legal responsibilities, not for other roles for which they have been given neither responsibility nor resources. Date: 1994 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:6:905-909_0 Access Statistics for this article American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.