Quality of reviews in epidemiology

R.A. Breslow, S.A. Ross and D.L. Weed

American Journal of Public Health, 1998, vol. 88, issue 3, 475-477

Abstract: Objectives. This study examined the quality of recent reviews in epidemiology. Methods. All 1995 issues of 7 widely read epidemiology journals were searched to identify reviews. Results. Twenty-nine reviews were identified. Methodology was not specified or incomplete for literature searches in 79% or reviews, the same was true for inclusion criteria in 83% and for combining studies in 62%. More than 60% of the reviews were not methodologically systematic. Conclusions. There is a need to improve the quality of review papers in epidemiology. If systematic methodology were followed more frequently, epidemiologic science and its application could be improved.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:3:475-477_6

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().