On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research

N. Krieger, P. Waterman, K. Lemieux, S. Zierler and J.W. Hogan

American Journal of Public Health, 2001, vol. 91, issue 7, 1114-1116

Abstract: Objectives. This study sought to determine the accuracy of geocoding for public health databases. Methods. A test file of 70 addresses, 50 of which involved errors, was generated, and the file was geocoded to the census tract and block group levels by 4 commercial geocoding firms. Also, the "real world" accuracy of the best-performing firm was evaluated. Results. Accuracy rotes in regard to geocoding of the test file ranged from 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 32%, 56%) to 84% (95% CI=73%, 92%). The geocoding firm identified as having the best accuracy rate correctly geocoded 96% of the addresses obtained from the public health databases. Conclusions. Public health studies involving geocoded databases should evaluate and report on methods used to verify accuracy.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2001:91:7:1114-1116_6

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().