The North from the South

Javier Finkman
Additional contact information
Javier Finkman: HSBC

Ensayos Económicos, 2009, vol. 1, issue 53-54, 107-115

Abstract: This paper analyzes similarities and differences between the Argentine crisis and the current crisis in developed countries, with its epicenter in the United States. Most economists of the North relate the current collapse to that of the 1930s. However, I argue here that the crises undergone by developing countries should be a useful reference when analyzing the global meltdown. This is not an original argument. Both Reinhart and Rogoff have found many common elements in the banking crises of developed and developing countries. They have studied the depth and duration of the crises based on a combined sample of countries and experiences. My purpose is, instead, to establish some analogies and determine their limits, between the 2001-2002 Argentine crisis and the United States crisis. The policy actions being implemented to respond to the global meltdown include both fiscal and monetary measures with an unprecedented scope in the post-war developed world. Among other actions, the interventions encompass low interest rates, expansion of the monetary base in open market operations including the direct purchase of low-quality assets, increasingly wider discount windows (as regards both the quality and quantity of the assets accepted), loans or contingent lines for financial institutions for the purchase of financial institutions, total or partial nationalizations, as well as a highly flexible regulatory framework. In turn, deposit insurances were increased either partially or totally. And, of course, there were also fiscal stimulus programs of different sizes. These public interventions have no relation whatsoever with the typical counter-cyclical policy whose purpose is to lessen the business cycle. Even more, the incubation of a crisis implies an exaggerated expansionary process, which presupposes the absence of a previously appropriate stabilization policy. Therefore, by definition, the post-crisis interventions are also exceptional. In fact, they are exceptional for the North but, except for the difference in the financial sophistication level, these interventions are more frequent in the South and this legitimates the use of an analogy-based reasoning.

Keywords: Argentina; international crisis; macroeconomic policy; United States (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E52 E61 E62 G01 H12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bcra.gov.ar/pdfs/investigaciones/53-54-5-Finkman.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcr:ensayo:v:1:y:2009:i:53-54:p:107-115

Access Statistics for this article

Ensayos Económicos is currently edited by Germán Feldman

More articles in Ensayos Económicos from Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Federico Grillo ().