How Do Behavioral Assumptions Affect Structural Inference? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
Daniel Houser () and
Joachim Winter ()
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2004, vol. 22, issue 1, 64-79
We use laboratory experiments to investigate the effect that assuming rational expectations has on structural inference in a dynamic discrete decision problem. Our design induces preferences up to the subjective rate of time preference, leaving unrestricted both this parameter and subjects' decision rules. We estimate subjects' discount rates under the assumption that all subjects use the rational expectations decision rule, and under weaker behavioral assumptions that allow decision rule heterogeneity. We find that certain sophisticated heuristics fit subjects' decisions statistically significantly better than rational expectations. However, the rational expectations assumption does not distort inferences about the cross-sectional discount rate distribution.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (22) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: How Do Behavioral Assumptions Affect Structural Inference? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment (2004)
Working Paper: How Do Behavioral Assumptions Affect Structural Inference? Evidence From A Laboratory Experiment (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:22:y:2004:i:1:p:64-79
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Jonathan H. Wright and Keisuke Hirano
More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().