Forecast Pretesting and Correction
Pekka Ilmakunnas ()
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1990, vol. 8, issue 4, 475-80
Sometimes it is suggested that end users can improve forecasts by some kind of corrections. At least implicitly, the idea is to use such corrections if the forecasts appear too inaccurate by some criteria. Alternative forecasts can be defined based on whether a preliminary test of forecast usefulness and a subsequent correction has been made. The mean squared errors as some such forecasts are studied using some recent results on inequality pretesting. Uncorrected forecasts are shown to perform reasonably well. The optimal minimax regret critical values for the preliminary tests are fairly high, implying that the hypothesis of forecast usefulness mostly should be accepted and uncorrected forecasts used.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: Forecast Pretesting and Correction (1990)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:8:y:1990:i:4:p:475-80
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Jonathan H. Wright and Keisuke Hirano
More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().