EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Plant‐Based versus Conventional Meat in Food Away From Home Settings: Substitution, Complementarity, and Market Impacts

Vincenzina Caputo, Jayson L. Lusk and Dan Blaustein‐Rejto

Agricultural Economics, 2025, vol. 56, issue 4, 587-603

Abstract: Evidence regarding whether consumers view plant‐based meat alternatives (PBMAs) as substitutes for or complements to meat is mixed; however, the ultimate effect of increased demand for PBMAs on poultry and livestock production depends on this relationship. Existing elasticity estimates primarily come from stated‐preference discrete‐choice models, which assume all options are substitutes. This study employs a basket‐based choice experiment (BBCE) to estimate own‐ and cross‐price elasticities in food‐away‐from‐home consumption settings. The elasticity estimates from the BBCE are then used to calibrate an equilibrium displacement model, which links shifts in demand for PBMAs to livestock and poultry supplies. Our findings indicate (1) there is a mix of complementarity and substitution between conventional meat and PBMAs, (2) the own‐price elasticity of PBMAs lies between those of premium meat options (salmon and ribeye steak) and more affordable choices (burgers and chicken breast), and (3) lowering prices of PBMAs (or increasing consumers’ willingness‐to‐pay for PBMAs) is unlikely to significantly impact conventional poultry and livestock production.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70002

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:agecon:v:56:y:2025:i:4:p:587-603

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0169-5150

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Economics is currently edited by W.A. Masters and G.E. Shively

More articles in Agricultural Economics from International Association of Agricultural Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-09
Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:56:y:2025:i:4:p:587-603