Lincoln Staffens and the McNamara Case: A Progressive Response to Class Conflict

Herbert Shapiro

American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1980, vol. 39, issue 4, 397-412

Abstract: Abstract. Lincoln Stevens' involvement with the McNamara case was one of the major concerns of his life. His Autobiography is not fully dependable regarding this incident; churches were not uniformly hostile to the settlement that ended the case and the Los Angeles Times, ignoring commitments to meet labor grievances, maintained its antiunion position. Steffens’ experimentation with “Golden Rule”Christian love as an alternative to class conflict reflected his divergent allegiances to Progressives who sought reform and to radicals, basically opposed to corporate capitalism. It also reflected his own rejection of class partisanship. Although the pledges made in the settlement were broken, Steffens remained loyal to the McNamaras and continued to argue it is futile to punish individuals for acts rooted in social conflict.

Date: 1980
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1980.tb01290.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:39:y:1980:i:4:p:397-412

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss

More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().