What Is ‘Just and Reasonable’ in Rent Control?Why Historic Cost Is More Rational Than Current Value

Stanley Kaish

American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1981, vol. 40, issue 2, 129-137

Abstract: Abstract. Rent control legislation must allow landlords to earn a “just and reasonable return” on their property. If the law prevents a landlord from attaining such a result he is entitled to seek relief by administrative or judicial process. The customary measure of ‘just and reasonable return’ is the current interest rate applied to current, fair market value. During a period of inflation such a calculation results in too high a measure. Because both interest rates and the value of tangible property rise together, rentals must increase at twice the inflation rate to meet the standard. Recent legal opinions evidence no appreciation or awareness of this. Furthermore, in a rent‐controlled situation it is impossible to establish a valid current market value for a property. Both difficulties are overcome if a ‘just and reasonable return’ is based on historic cost rather than current market value. Arguments in favor of historic cost are made employing capital market analysis and classical rent theory.

Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01379.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:40:y:1981:i:2:p:129-137

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss

More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().