On the Use and Abuse of Thorstein Veblen in Modern American Sociology, II: Daniel Bell and the ‘Utopianizing’ of Veblen's Contribution and Its Integration by Robert Merton and C. W. Mills

Rick Tilman and J. L. Simich

American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1984, vol. 43, issue 1, 103-114

Abstract: Abstract. The analyses and applications of Thorstein Veblen's social theory by Daniel Bell, Robert Merton, and C. Wright Mills are criticized. Bell's analysis is deficient because it distorts Veblen's proposal for economic reconstruction and because it treats him as a hopelessly Utopian theorist. Merton's use of Veblen's theory of status emulation by linking it with latent and manifest functions is a noteworthy accomplishment; yet Merton's utilization of Veblenian concepts is too sparing and essentially apolitical. Only the treatment of Veblen's theories by Mills is theoretically systematic and sufficiently political in tone. The significant import of Veblen's work for an indigenous critical theory resides in his theories of social value, status emulation, conflict and cultural lag.

Date: 1984
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb02228.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:43:y:1984:i:1:p:103-114

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss

More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().